How the 'need' for buildings and properties tends to corrupt
the Church
Where in the New Testament do we find the disciples of Jesus
building temples,
synagogues, or churches? Where do we find them taking
offerings to purchase
property? On the contrary, we find that the Lord's disciples
frequently sold their
property to meet the needs of the poor among them, that they met in
public places and in
their homes, that Jesus Himself warned that those who follow Him would
often find they had
no place to rest their heads, that they would be driven from the
synagogues, and worship
has to do with spirit and truth and not location.
Did the early Church not erect synagogues because they were
unable? Or because
they understood something that was later forgotten? I will
not set out here to show
that buildings are in themselves sinful or forbidden by the Scripture,
there exists no
such verse. I will lay out an argument that owning buildings or
properties by an assembly
of believers will tend to corrupt the message of the gospel, corrupt
the understanding of
what Church is, and will tend to corrupt the leadership of the
assembly. It may be
possible to avoid such dangers; it may also be possible to avoid
temptation while
preaching in a brothel, but a mature disciple would avoid boastful
overconfidence while
walking through the devil's playground. Indeed, the
Scriptures admonish us to
"flee temptation." We ought to avoid giving opportunity to
the world, the
flesh, and the devil. What opportunity is there, you ask, in
church buildings?
- Involving the Church with the State
- Money, or more precisely, the need for money.
The first reason the assembly of the Lord ought to avoid
owning buildings or property
is entanglement with the State. For a church to own property
as a church basically
requires incorporation. The church must go to the State and
ask permission to do
what they imagine God wants them to do. Is the will of God
subject to State
approval? Of course, the State expects certain concessions
for its permission.
Did you ever notice that the articles of incorporation include a clause
that nothing in
the articles or bylaws is to be contrary to the laws of the State?
So much for
Jesus is Lord. Hail Caesar! Did you know that once
you incorporate, the
believers do not own the property but the corporation, which is a
"legal person"
and a creature of the State? That is how the Federal
Government regulates the
contents of the Sunday sermon. By law, the church cannot
endorse political
candidates or be heavily involved in political issues. I am
not in favor of
Christians becoming involved in politics, but that is not because I
believe that the God
has nothing to say about what goes on in the world. If you
don't think this is a
problem today, check out what happened to Indianapolis Baptist Temple.
Disciples of
Jesus must maintain that Jesus and only Jesus is Lord. We can
not bow down before
the golden image at the command of the State. And if you
think that the fierily
furnace doesn't await us in this nation -just wait!
In regard to MONEY: The acquisition of property will tend to
effect the goals and
actions of an assembly of believers. An example of this is
what I personally saw
happen to a "Coffee House" youth ministry. It began in the
70s as a part
of the tail end of the Jesus Revolution. In a rented downtown
storefront, a
Christian couple with other disciples, opened a Saturday
night youth ministry where
they would invite Christian bands and others to come and
"minister." Soon,
they were given the opportunity to move into an old YMCA building which
they could rent
for $1 a year. Sounded great, right? The Lord
blessed, right? Only one
small problem, the building was huge. The physical needs of
trying to maintain an
old structure as well as trying to heat the place in the winters of
Wisconsin put a huge
stress on those trying to serve the Lord. The focus of
everything now became the
building: heating the building, fixing the building, renovating the
building.
The place was so huge that the "Coffee House" experienced "mission
creep." First, they added a bookstore. Not that
another Christian
bookstore was really needed - but they had all this room and they had
to figure out what
to do with it. We should be good stewards of what the Lord
had given, right?
Next, the Methodist church across the street decided that running a
homeless shelter in
their basement was "messy" and that moved into the old "Y".
However, in spite of everyone's intention to serve the Lord,
the needs of the material
overwhelmed the spiritual. Volunteers came and then left,
having been burned out by
the ministry's leaders trying meet the needs of the building, and meet
city code.
Appeal after appeal went out, first to Christians, then churches, and
then to the city in
general, for money to keep the lights on. Then, the day came
when the owner of the
old building decided to sell it to the city who wanted a parking lot on
that location
(cities and businesses always prefer parking lots to homeless
shelters.) Now, they
had to buy a building to accommodate all their ministries.
With a new (old) building
and mortgage came even greater needs for money. The new
building would also have to
be renovated (more volunteers burned out and up.)
More conflicts with the
city. Now, even lawsuits against the city, as the ministry
sought to stay in their
building in the downtown business district. The beginning of
the end came after a
coalition of the city and community businesses bought out the
ministry's downtown center
for $500,000. Another blessing, right? But long ago
the focus had shifted from
people to property. Those in leadership no longer were able
to discern the mind of
Christ. Finally, spiritual blindness and death brought an end
to
"ministry."
I was there. I was involved. I saw the carnage that
comes when we take "the
way that seems right unto man." In church after
church I have seen the
same thing reflected in budgets and board meetings. What
starts with the Spirit ends
in the flesh, as we again and again choose our ways and our wisdom over
the wisdom that
comes from above. If you want to dance to the devil's tune,
you will have to pay the
piper. The mere fact that we begin to think that we NEED
money to "keep the
church going" proves we have been corrupted. Buildings and
properties are of
this world and require the currency of this world to obtain and
maintain them. This
NEED for money will always tend to corrupt. What pastor does
not at times take into
account his church budget when considering the content of his
sermon? Perhaps not
always consciously, but there is always present the concern to not
offend the big donors,
always the temptation to teach tithing as the way to God's blessing.
More recently, I was serving as a pastor of a small SBC
Baptist church. After
having been there for a few months, a delegation of the leading members
invited me to a
meeting to share some concerns. It seems some of my sermons
were too long (more than
20 minutes) and some visitors were not coming back. The need
for a user-friendly
church was emphasized and I should take care to make people
comfortable. The
implication was clear. It takes money to pay the
bills. It takes members to
get the money.
It is this very perceived need for money that James condemns
when he says,
For
if a man comes into your assembly with a gold ring and dressed in fine
clothes, and there also comes in a poor man in dirty clothes, and you
pay special attention to the one who is wearing the fine clothes, and
say, "You sit here in a good place," and you say to the poor man, "You
stand over there, or sit down by my footstool," have you not made
distinctions among yourselves, and become judges with evil motives?
Listen, my beloved brethren: did not God choose the poor of this world
to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those
who love Him? But you have dishonored the poor man. Is it not the rich
who oppress you and personally drag you into court? Do they not
blaspheme the fair name by which you have been called? (James 2:2-7)
Why would Christians show preference for the rich? MONEY! They
think they need MONEY!
It was at this point I realized that the institutional church
cannot be revived or
reformed. The very legs that support it; the professional
clergy, and the
institutional and physical structures, are the very things that tie it
to this world and
hinder the disciples of Jesus from accomplishing His work.
"Ministry" that requires the things of
this world is of this
World. Did Jesus or His disciples require grand auditoriums
to preach the gospel
in? Did they require hospitals to heal the sick in?
Did Jesus require
warehouses for His food distribution program? If you say, "Of
course not, He
was the Son of God," then you have condemned yourself out of your own
mouth.
Jesus and the early Church did their works in the power of the Spirit.
The fact
that we think that buildings, properties, corporations, seminaries, and
money are
essential or even desirable, proves that our ministries are neither
dependent on or
empowered by the Holy Spirit. As soon as we think we need the
things of this world
to do the work of God, we have turned from God to the World! And it is
such a simple
switch for us to make. After all, we were raised in the
world. All our lives
we have been taught by our parents, by teachers, by television, and by
society at large
that "WE CANNOT DO WITHOUT THE THINGS OF THIS WORLD." So, we
thoughtlessly
bring this strange fire of worldly wisdom into the tabernacle of the
Lord. We would
do well to remember the fate of Nadab and Abihu.
|